Buying evidence ·

Interest is not evidence

“Strong interest” records a mood. It does not identify who acted or what changed inside the organization.

Five cloth-guild syndics gather around an open ledger while a servant stands behind them.
Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn · De Staalmeesters · 1662 · Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam (SK-C-6) · public domain · image provenance

An industrial account may include a user who wants the capability, an engineer who must approve it, a gatekeeper who controls access, a buyer who manages the purchase, and a manager who carries the operating or financial consequence. Their reactions belong in separate records.

Signals in increasing order of commitment
Observed behaviour What it supports
A relevant person describes the problem in their own terms. The problem is recognized by that role.
Someone examines technical or operating data. The question merits scarce technical attention.
The organization shares a requirement, sample, part, or operating condition. It is willing to expose part of the real application.
A person with authority states an acceptance threshold. A decision process can be tested.
People, equipment, budget, or a review date are assigned. The organization has made a limited commitment.

None of these behaviours guarantees adoption. They do make the opportunity more specific and easier to disprove. One cautious manager who defines an acceptance condition can provide more useful information than several enthusiastic conversations.

Give pursuit a stop rule

If an agreed step repeatedly produces no data, owner, access, or date, the opportunity should leave the active queue. The record can be retained and revisited when circumstances change. It should no longer consume the same resources as an account whose behaviour has advanced.

The practical distinction is cost. Attention, information, access, equipment, and review time are scarce. Evidence appears when another organization chooses to spend one of them.

Source